This research material has four sections:

1). A brief introduction to thought broadcast delusion and the cause behind it. 

2). Reported synchronicities by human beings around the world. These synchronicities are the actual cause behind this false belief/delusion.

3). How to understand if you are facing synchronicities and that your belief or the conclusion(s) is not true.

4). How to find an answer to the mystery behind synchronicity?

(To find an answer to this mystery we have to understand the actual cause behind these synchronicities. The cause behind these synchronicities can be understood by analyzing data associated with the phenomenon of spirits, paranormal experiences, and the phenomenon of UFOs as well since all these experiences show a clear correlation. This is not how the medical community is currently expecting to find an answer. However, did you know that synchronicity is one of the major phenomena reported in the literature of UFOs and the literature of spirits? Why do we see this correlation?)

1). A Brief Introduction:

Contrary to the medical community’s long-held belief that thought broadcasting delusion is a mental illness, deep analysis of the phenomenon reported by human beings around the world shows that the cause behind this claim is high number of synchronistic events that an individual faces. In other words, prior to claiming that your thoughts are broadcasting/people know your thoughts and other related claims, you would observe that actions/thoughts of yours are getting synchronized with actions and thoughts of people around you in such a way where these events give you false evidence for you to believe that your thoughts are broadcasting/people know your thoughts. This is why people give references to the belief that they have. The medical community has failed to recognize the existence of the phenomenon and how it affects a person psychologically, so instead of analyzing how the phenomenon affects our conclusions, we have been engaged in brain research to find a cure for this hypothetical decease. However, this is not a decease of the mind/brain and it’s not because of chemical imbalance as hypothesized by us. This is an erroneous conclusion only just like other erroneous conclusions that you would end up having in your daily life. For instance, you could believe that a friend of yours has done something wrong to you but the information you find later confirms that your friend is actually innocent. Meaning, understanding the misunderstanding fixed the false belief. Just like these events, understanding the existence of these synchronicities and seeing these events as synchronicities will help people to come out of the delusion or to correct the false belief. However, the reason, why people cannot recognize these synchronicities as synchronicities is because an intelligent force is behind these synchronicities and it provides highly convincing false evidence supporting these false beliefs. Understanding the misunderstanding is a challenge to an experiencer, cause the existence of such a phenomenon has not been recognized by us as of now. Due to this reason, the experiencer makes various assumptions to understand the experience and they get misdirected in their efforts.

In the near future, we will also be able to erase these false memories and get out of these delusions instantly. For those who are interested in getting to know the future direction of where the science of memory is heading, below is a great documentary.

Here is a typical synchronistic experience reported by people around the world:

Screen Shot 2019-09-25 at 10.34.21 AM


This strange phenomenon could happen with live TV/Radio presenters, TV/Radio commercials, or even with TV shows. For instance, assume you are reading something that has the word “key terms” in it. By the time you read this unique word, you will hear live TV presenter say the same word at the exact moment or just seconds after that, in his spoken words. This timing activity could happen with TV commercials and TV shows as well. By analyzing these events deeply, you will come to an understanding that your thoughts and actions are getting affected mysteriously in such a way for you to experience these synchronistic events. But then again sometimes, thoughts/actions of others and even digital systems (e.g., receiving an automated promotional message according to your thoughts) are getting affected due to your thoughts/actions. 

According to Dr. Bernard’s survey, the most frequent coincidence was:

 – I think of an idea and hear or see it on the radio, TV or internet. (Out of 1500 people who has visited the site, 200 (13%) had taken the weird coincidence survey)


(Dr. Bernard is a visiting professor at the University of Virginia and a former chair of the Department of Psychiatry at the University of Missouri-Colombia)

2). Reported synchronicities by human beings around the world. These synchronicities are the actual cause behind this false belief/delusion.

Although the above-mentioned experience is not from a person with a delusion, the same phenomenon makes people think that their thoughts are broadcasting/people know my thoughts. For these individuals, most of the time, the phenomenon occurs according to a narrative that is already running in their minds, so they will end up creating a chain of false beliefs that are interconnected. Here are the reported cases:

Case Study 1). This individual states:

I). “I used to think people could hear my thoughts, but that was because people would very often say something in response to what I had just thought. It used to scare me a lot” – In other words, he/she observes human beings reacting to his/her thoughts in such a way where these reactions always show meaningful correlations to his/her thoughts; these are synchronicities. A high number of synchronistic events has provided her false evidence supporting the false belief that “people know my thoughts.” This could happen to anyone out of the blue, regardless of the emotional state. Meaning, even at the peak of your happiness, you could start facing synchronicities that would psychologically affect you. 


(To make sense of this experience, assume your thoughts are actually broadcasting, if so what kind of possible reactions that you would observe from people? This line of thinking will help a researcher to understand these unusual experiences. Due to an unknown reason to humanity, only certain people in the world are facing these experiences. Therefore, it’s hard to understand this phenomenon, if you have never experienced it. This is not imagination and this is not a mental illness either.)


Case Study 2).

I). “it is very scary when everyone says stuff that is relevant to what your thinking”. – Meaning, the spoken words of people have been correlating with his/her own thoughts. And these synchronistic events have been providing false evidence supporting the false belief, which is “people know my thoughts.”



Case Study 3).

I). “Oh I think something and I hear my dad and his gf talking thinking they’re commenting on what I was thinking” – The spoken words of Dad and his girlfriend have correlated with this individual’s thoughts. Observing a high number of such synchronistic events is the cause behind the belief, which is “people know my thoughts.”




Case Study 4).

I). “We’ve excluded coincidence, like driving past a yellow signpost and both mentioning yellow” – Which is a meaningful verbal event or a synchronicity.

II). “a new gym instructor. I told her I had spinal fractures and was thinking about the accident when I told her. She said “from falling of a horse?” – While she was thinking about her accident, the gym instructor mentions what she was thinking just like she knew her thoughts, which is again a meaningful verbal event or a synchronicity. People who claim that their thoughts are broadcasting are facing an extremely high number of such experiences. This is also the reason why they give references to their belief.  

III). She further states that “I nodded, she (gym instructor) said “you look like a horse person.” –  The gym instructor was giving references to the thoughts once again. Therefore, these are meaningful verbal events or synchronistic events.

IV). She mentions this odd event to her husband, and she says: “Anyway I got home and started to tell my husband. I told him she said, “from falling off a horse” to which he replied “she said you look like a horse rider! Huh? I was stumped”. – Which is another meaningful verbal event or a synchronicity, cause she already heard these words from her gym instructor and now her husband is referring to her thoughts/earlier events.



Case Study 5).

I). “she actually looked at me when I was getting intrusive thoughts or thinking about her reading my mind”–  She is referring to a meaningful nonverbal event or a synchronicity that she observed. If you experience these events, it will quickly grab your attention since these events keep recurring. Therefore, it is not that people are finding patterns that are not there, people are stating what they observe and they come to a conclusion based on what they observe. Patterns are already there. They make false assumptions to understand the events, so they end up in false conclusions. The medical community takes these as delusions and attribute them to mental illness without knowing. 



Case Study 6).

I). “I used to think this, because people would respond to what I was thinking all the time.” – In other words, these are meaningful verbal & nonverbal events or synchronicities. These events will always correlate with the observer’s thoughts. 



Case Study 7).

I). “Any how, when I’m around someone, I have these conversations in my head as if I’m talking to them out loud. And they react in a funny way to some of these thoughts when I’m around them, kind like body movements, reactions, sniffing etc. as if they don’t agree or can’t believe” – Actions of random people gets synchronized with his own thoughts. This synchronization is what makes the individual believe that these random people are aware of his thoughts. 

He further states: “Every time i’m in a car (easily can meditate) with my dad, I start thinking (thoughts) stuff about someone or me and it gets that intense he will take longer roads/ drive slower as if he’s getting my brain connection” – Again what we see here is that actions of his dad gets synchronized with his own thoughts/actions. These are meaningful nonverbal events/synchronicities. These events are occurring in such a way to make him believe that “my  dad/people know my thoughts.” 



Case Study 8).

I). “everyone’s reactions sometimes perfectly align with your thoughts.” In other words, he observes a high number of meaningful verbal and nonverbal events that correlate with his thoughts. 

II). “I curse out my dad in my head and insult him mentally so he’ll leave me alone.”  Which means, when he has these negative thoughts about Dad, he observes a nonverbal action  from Dad, and these events have made him conclude that “Dad knows my thoughts.”



Case Study 9).

I). “It’s really hard when you can see and hear people responding to your thoughts and emotions judgingly, and critically all the time” – Referring to verbal and nonverbal synchronistic events.

II). “they just say it isn’t real. But how can I disbelieve something that I can see, hear, and feel every day in my soul?” –  Since she is observing a high number of synchronicities, she raises this question. Imagine this situation as if you are the experiencer of these synchronicities. If so, you would ask the same question from others.

III). “How could I ever trust anyone??” People would reject her belief which is “people know my thoughts,” but this is not something she can believe since she is observing this strange phenomenon. The cause behind the trust issues of these individuals is synchronicities. 




Case Study 10).

I). “So many coincidences happened for me to believe it is real such as responses to people near me / family when I have bad thoughts.” – These are synchronistic events that correlate with this individual’s thoughts/actions.

Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 9.12.56 PM


Case Study 11).

I). “It’s hard not to think that I’m the one they’re referring to and it’s too coincidental with their choice of words whenever I’m nearby.” – A high number of synchronicities that correlate with her thoughts has made her believe that her thoughts are broadcasting. This is the reason behind her false belief.


Case Study 12).

I). “They respond to my thoughts instantly. Especially they ‘They can’t read my thoughts’ thought, like today I thought this at a person at work and they literally turned right around and looked me right in my eyes and started saying something in reference to something I’ve been thinking about often. It was like he was a robot.” – 

Here the victim of these synchronicities faces two types of synchronicities. One synchronicity falls under the non-verbal communication category, which is “looked me right in my eyes.” He observes this phenomenon when he tried to test his hypothesis, which is “they can’t read my thoughts.” The synchronicity (the meaningful coincidence/event) which occurred confused him and made him think that “ no people can read my thoughts, and that’s why the reaction.” He further states that the colleague said something that correlated with his thoughts; which is a meaningful verbal event. This synchronicity provided additional false evidence supporting his belief. Meaning, both these synchronicities provided false evidence to his false belief which is “people know my thoughts.”

II). “People around me visually react (it’s not me making an assumption of whether they could ‘hear’ me or not) – they physically contort themselves (their faces, their actions, what they say) in ways that would affirm that they are indeed aware that they can pick up my thoughts as I think them.” – In other words, actions of random people get synchronized with his actions/thoughts. 

III). “I’ve tried various types of thoughts to get a reaction out of the people around me and the people react accordingly.” – These are synchronistic events that he observes.

IV). “People around me are constantly doing this ‘cough’” – This is also a meaningful nonverbal event or a synchronicity that recurs often to him, so he believes that people are coughing on purpose.



Case Study 13).

I). “I always start to panic a bit when I’m about to anticipate talking to a stranger incase I get voices in my head calling them abusive names like you’re an ***hole.” Then the forum member further states, “I swear to god, there reaction on there face sometimes looks like shock, like they have heard what I said in my head.” – These synchronistic events are correlating with this individual’s thoughts.

II). Since this individual faces a high number of such synchronistic events correlating with thoughts, he/she further states “I keep telling my self its a coincidence, but too many coincidences are making me paranoid.”




Case Study 14).

I). “ Yes, all the time” –  A reply to the above post confirming the existence of the phenomenon.

II). “Have you ever asked someone if they hear your thoughts? Well I have.. actually alot of people and all I can come up with at this moment is what are the chances everyone is lying to me?” –  Since human beings cannot read minds, people are rejecting the belief, but the phenomenon is still has managed to confuse the individual to think that it’s happening.

III). “Am I that much of a threat there’s a conspiracy against me?” – Which is another assumption to understand the phenomenon.




Case Study 15).

I). “I’ll think of something and seconds later someone on the TV will mention it out of nowhere.” – Verbal synchronicities.

II). “Later on I’ll be at the store thinking about it again and someone standing in line will suddenly blurt out what I was saying in my head. I thought it was coincidence at first but it’s been happening just about every day.” – Referring to the synchronistic events that keep occurring. These events are giving convincing false evidence to support the view that “people can hear my thoughts.”


Case Study 16).

I).  “I’ve had it for years, people saying stuff that has been on my mind.” – Meaning, things that people say correlate with his thoughts. 

II). Since he observes a high number of such synchronistic events and these are not imagined events, he further states, “ I do know that all these so-called coincidences are actually happening.”



Case Study 17).

I). “So how I was convinced of such bizarre idea? In my case, I noticed strange stares from foreign people in the street, some of them were aggressive but the others were kind. At first I thought it was coincidences or they simply noticed something strange on me, but this happened over and over again at the point that it was impossible to neglect it” – This individual has been observing a strange repetitive behavior in human beings towards him and that has confused him at first.

II). “The situation remains ambiguous until the time I noticed that people that I know have strange behavior in front of me, like looking at me strangely and the most frightening thing was hearing some of them repeating some of my ideas and looking at me with a smile on the face” – At this stage, he has started observing both meaningful verbal and nonverbal events or synchronistic events correlating with his thoughts.

III). “So the obvious explanation was that somehow they know me!!! But how this can be possible? I came up with some weird theories like someone spread rumors about me, I started looking for something about me on the net and the newspapers but I did not find anything” 

IV). So I start looking for it on the net until I found that these experience are shared by a lot of people around the globe, and it’s a common mental illness called ‘thought broadcasting’.” 

(This is not a symptom of mental illness. Human beings around the world are trying to understand the phenomenon that they observe, and they come up with various explanations to describe what they observe) 



Case Study 18).

I). “I can’t believe humanity is actually in the dark about a phenomenon that is absolutely real and basically the most interesting thing we have come across so far as a species (in my opinion, of course). I would love to read anybody’s take on this, especially if you’ve been through something similar.” – These synchronistic events that correlate with our thoughts are not imagined events, this is why this individual is making this statement.

II). “At first it just felt like people nearby were talking about me, and it went from neutral to demeaning and derogatory really quickly. All of a sudden I couldn’t be outside without having people talk about me and accuse me of being someone I am not.” – These claims are due to synchronistic events that he has been observing. (Imagine a situation where people indirectly talking about you every day)

III). “Taking the bus or the train were like hell for a few months, especially when I noticed that people were supposedly listening to my thoughts and my perception went from delusion of reference to thought broadcasting” – At this stage, these synchronistic events have started correlating with his thoughts. Later, this individual could even experience synchronicities from TV and Radio. When synchronicities change, assumptions would also change to understand the experience; as a result, false beliefs will also change. 



Case Study 19).

I). “I know other people like family can hear me because of the way they react or side comments when they hear it”– These are meaningful verbal and nonverbal events or synchronistic events.



Case Study 20).

I). “They will say things out loud about what I’m thinking, make snide comments, even yell hello ‘my name’.” – Spoken words and nonverbal actions of people were correlating with his thoughts.

II). “It’s like I’m in a world wide conspiracy where I’m being tested to see if I can become someone of importance when I die.” – Certain synchronicities can establish unique beliefs in a person’s mind. The reason behind this claim is again due to meaningful verbal and nonverbal synchronicities.

III). Depending on the synchronistic events, one could even think that people are using nasty names to address him/her.



Case Study 21).

I). “And of course the people that seem to be able to pick up your thought processes and who subtly hint at it” 

(Some repetitive events such as coughing, bangs on the walls could make a person believe that people are trying to disturb him/her on purpose. Again, these events would occur in a synchronistic manner. So synchronicity is the cause behind the false conclusion.)



Case Study 22).

I).  “Sometimes when I think of bad things to others they just respond through some kind of actions”. 

Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 9.30.39 PM.png

Case Study 23).

I). “I would hear words that I had been thinking before which increased my paranoia while I walked through the campus” – The spoken words of people have correlated with his own thoughts.

II). “I had a strange occurrence in the bus ride back home as I thought to myself that I might be gay and then a girl on the bus was laughing and talking about the same thing.” – Here he is referring to a meaningful nonverbal event or synchronistic event that he has observed.



Case Study 24).

I). “I broadcast very offensive thoughts, against my will. I broadcast racial stuff. I swear I’m not a racist. Anything the least bit sensitive I broadcast offensive messages about. It’s humiliating for me and for everyone else” – These are synchronistic events and he sees clear correlations to his thoughts.



25). He further states the below on another thread:

I). “One time I was sitting outside McDonald’s in Was Mart thinking about getting a big glass of sweet tea. This guy not too far away started talking about someone wanting tea and wanting to get the caffeine and sugar high from it, which was exactly what I was thinking”. – Spoken words have correlated with his thoughts.

II). “one time I was delivering pizza, and I had a cold and I felt bad. I was being a little gruff with my customers. Then this disk jockey on the radio started talking about a pizza delivery man  who was being rude to his customers. I’ve experienced lots of things like this. It’s weird”- Radio presenters spoken words have correlated with his thoughts. 


Case Study 26).

I).  “They are repeating what I’ve thought to myself. I know people who have not experience this may think I’m nuts.” – Verbal synchronicities.

II). “How can you be around people that are listening to your thoughts and saying what you thought to yourself out loud and laughing at you because of your thought process. I prayed so many times to be just taken away because I feel tortured.” – Spoken words and nonverbal actions such as laughing have been correlating with her thoughts. 

III). “I was singing alone to a song and the people on the radio thought it was funny””. 




Case Study 27).

I). “What your experiencing isn’t bogus and I’m going through the same. It started with patterns that became obvious to me throughout the years. And it isn’t patterns that psychologist will say ‘are these patterns that your making yourself believe that are there/real?’ No these patterns are so obvious and people have made it so obvious to me” – These are not imagined events. These are synchronistic events, so the patterns are already there, and people state what they observe. However, people make false assumptions to understand the complicated phenomenon that they observe, so they end up in false conclusions. These false conclusions are what we take as delusions.

II). “Cutting to the most obvious experience. Just two months ago I was taking my class for a guard card in downtown. The night before one of the classes I was so mad at my self for thinking racial thoughts (this is already years after putting the dots together. And my thought presses was becoming close to impossible to control.) so I was talking to myself/them in my head about how I’m not really racist and we are all brothers and sister etc. The next day my teacher during his class he says the exact same speech I did the night before. I’m talking about exact. Most of my encounters people are slick to hide the fact. Put this guy really didn’t give a damn word for word what I thought the night before just mocking me. At first I was shocked thinking there is no way this is happening.” – He takes an example where spoken words correlated with his thoughts. 

III). “Like I said I have so many experiences similar that are so obvious that people can read my thoughts.” 



Case Study 28).

I). “I get embarrassed because I’ll think of some embarrassing memories and I feel like they’re internally laughing at me.” – Referring to the synchronicities that were observed.

II). “I’ve told my mom I feel like people can read my mind and she always says they can’t but sometimes people will slip up and say out loud what I was thinking” – Referring to meaningful verbal synchronicities.



Case Study 29).

I). “I use to believe that people used behaviorism in order to mime my every move and thought.” – Nonverbal synchronistic events.

II). “When I thought about something and another person would say that same thing I thought that sometime prior to the incident” – Verbal synchronistic events.



Case Study 30).

I). “I also feel like people speak indirectly about me and what my thoughts are” – Verbal synchronistic events.

II). “I believe people can definitely see through my eyes, hear my thoughts etc.” – Referring to synchronicities.

III). “About a week ago, I was at a friend’s house with a couple of people and I jokingly said “ I don’t get along with lawn chairs very well’ from a past drunk experience and one of them took it wrong and started mocking me by saying ‘We need some shitty tin folding chairs to sin on, the cheap ones that people only get for outside. But we should get them for when we have a lot of guests over. Ghetto ass shitty tin chairs. This happened in Florida and in my family’s house in New Jersey my family uses folding chairs for family parties and around the house’”

IV). “There is absolutely no way she would know this as she’s never been in my house but everyone was lacking as mocking me.” 



Case Study 31).

I). “I try to convince myself it’s impossible that people can read my mind but that’s hard to do when I see that their mood changes accordingly to my thoughts.” – Nonverbal synchronicities.



Case Study 32).

I). “So many coincidences happened for me to believe it is real such as responses to people near me / family when I have bad thoughts”. – Referring to synchronistic events.

Screen Shot 2019-09-24 at 9.31.56 PM.png


Case Study 33).

I). “It’s just creepy af that they can say it in the exact words as it was in my mind.” – Verbal synchroncities.



Case Study 34).

I). “e.g I will walking down the road and I’ll see an overweight lady & then what will pop into my mind is ‘what a fat bit**, the lady will then look at me in disgust & act funny towards me.” – A nonverbal synchronicity.

II). Since these events are observable, he/she further states, “I do not think that I’m paranoid.”



Case Study 35).

I).  “Years ago, each night at dinner my own family was exposing my immediate thoughts, but I was like ‘keep cool, it’s nothing’” – Referring to synchronistic events.

II). “I was noticing the same thing with the televisions, and with synchronism.” – Referring to the synchronistic events that were observed through TV.

III). “Something I was really hating was when you were having a lovely thought about last night with your girlfriend, and people was talking about it, but never directly” – Verbal synchronicities.

IV). “The employer is playing with your immediate thoughts” – He was facing synchronicities with the employer as well.


Source: Source:–64552

Case Study 36).

I).  “I’m convinced that people can hear what I’m thinking. For example, while at work I looked at a woman and thought ‘excuse me’ and she moved out of the way.’ – A nonverbal synchronicity.

II). “Also, while out and people will verbalize something related to what I may be saying to myself. What’s really going on?.” – Spoken words of people were correlating with his/her thoughts.



Case Study 37).

I). “You know what your not crazy. I experience the same thing and I know how it feels. You think a thought and instantly someone around you says or does something that is related to whatever your thinking” –  Verbal and nonverbal synchronicities.



Case Study 38).

I). “I am the same ~ I always asked myself, WHY do people say what I’m thinking?”– Synchronistic events that are verbal.

II). “WE could be thinking on what they are about to say. We might just have a high intuitive or intuition. I feel we have a gift. We know what they are going to say, before they speak it 🙂 ” – These are assumptions that this individual was making to understand the phenomenon. These are not unshakeable delusions.



Case Study 39).

I). “I would thinking something, then someone I knew who was with me would practically just say what I was thinking. At first I thought ‘Oh it’s that’s just a coincidence’. But it just got progressively more upfront. You know? Like people would just f*** with me on purpose” – Verbal synchronicities. 

II). “I was talking with my cousin and she said:”You need a job” And I didn’t say ANYTHING but I thought: “F*** you, I sell coke I make double you make in a couple days”. Then immediately after (She didn’t know I sold drugs by the way) she was like: “Even thought some drug dealers make twice more than me, they all get busted in the end”. – Verbal synchronicities.

III).   “I’m hanging out with my friend and he invites me to come for a drive and smoke some weed with his friends. Im like, yeah why not? So during the session on of his friends drops the joint and I think in my head: “This f*****g kid is an idiot, I want to hit him” (I did not say/think anything negative about the dude but IMMEDIATELY after I thought that I noticed my friend Looked at me and was like whatthef***? I noticed after he kept looking at me through the rearview and that just made me uneasy. I repeat I did not say anything to him but I couldn’t help but thinking everytime he loked at me and I noticed I would think: “This fucking guy keeps looking at me” He would right after look away. it got to the point where he just wanted to get home.” 




Case Study 40).

I). “When I’m a public place, and thinking about something inappropriate, or dirty, I feel like people are staring at me” – Nonverbal synchronicities.



Case Study 41).

I). I like how they through out key words to let you know that they hear you”–  Verbal synchronicities.



Case Study 42).

I). “I am 100% sure most people can hear me, as I do tests to embarrass them and I can see the response”. Sometimes, an individual could also observe meaningful verbal and nonverbal actions from people when they carry out tests to understand the phenomenon.

II). “I can be positive or I can be negative, it seems that when I have negative thoughts with anger I see the nerve or fidgeting responses.” – Nonverbal synchronicities.



Case Study 43).

I). “there have been several references to my thoughts in the media, movies, tv shows etc, including social media sites” – Referring to synchronicities.



Case Study 44).

I). “I walk past people and they laughing at my thoughts” – Nonverbal synchronicities.

II). “I hear people commenting on things I have thought” – Verbal synchronicities.

III). “i.e beep this tune if you can hear my thoughts, and then they do” – Nonverbal synchronicities.



Case Study 45).

I). “Everybody would smile at me and laugh when I walked by because they knew what I was thinking.” – Nonverbal synchronicities.



Case Study 46).

I). A normal, non-homeless person walking past you who responds to one of your thoughts accurately out loud”. 

II). Since people cannot know the thoughts of others, people never acknowledge that they can read minds. Due to this, the individual further states, “they will never talk about it directly.” – The phenomenon or synchronicities are deceiving people.




Case Study 47).

I). “I know I do it because at my old work there were instances where my coworkers would ask me something and it would either leave me scratching my head or shocked at how they knew something only I thought I did” Verbal synchronicities.



Case Study 48).

I). “Today a Japanese guy put himself in front of me to cover me up,” and then later he mentions that he said “thank you” to Japanese guy in his mind and the Japanese guy turned around and looked at me. – This is a meaningful nonverbal event or a synchronicity.




In summary, we could identify two types of synchronicities. Synchronicities that are verbal and synchronicities that are nonverbal.

Verbal Synchronicities:
Your thoughts/actions would synchronize with spoken words (face to face conversation, TV/ Radio presenters speech, telephone conversations, etc.) of another individual.  

For example:

i). While you are thinking something, the person who stays next to you talk about the same thing or would say something that would correlate with your thoughts.

ii). The person who is next to you would write something, and that will correlate with your thoughts, or you receive an email where its title or body would show correlations to your thought. (Digital systems correlate with your thoughts/actions)

Nonverbal Synchronicities: Your thoughts/actions would correlate with nonverbal actions of people. Nonverbal actions such as sudden facial expressions (smiling, laughing, frowning, etc.), sudden gestures, signs, sudden eye contact, sudden behavioral changes, paralinguistic events (tone and loudness of spoken speech, etc.,).

For example:

i). You got a negative thought in your mind about the person who is sitting next to you, and you observe that person suddenly look into your eyes and frown or move away from you. And this kind of experience happens to you quite often.

ii). While you are thinking of something, the person who is staying next to you says something in a sarcastic (voice tone) manner or that person would suddenly smile or laugh, and you see a clear correlation to your thought.

3). How to understand if you are facing synchronicities and that your belief or the conclusion(s) is not true:

I).  You will observe a high number of meaningful coincidences/events. 

II). Most of the time, it would be like people are indirectly referring to your thoughts/life events.

III). Various observable events will make you even believe that people know your thoughts / know you / know your life events.

IV). You see that your conclusions are controversial yet these unusual events still convince you.

V). Certain events can even make you think that your government, police officers, people in the streets, corporations, your family members, friends, etc. are conspiring against you / harassing you on purpose or even monitoring you. 

VI). People would reject your claim/your strange accusations.

VII). What you observe is not normal human behavior. 

VIII). You will have to give so many references to explain the reason behind your belief to another person. 

IX). The medical community will identify these references as ideas of references and delusions of references. Although you might think that your experience is unique, the medical community will quickly recognize that your claim is a typical claim made by thousands and thousands of people out there. 

X). These events are not random coincidences/events, there’s an intelligence behind the coincidences/events. You could also see a purpose and an intention. But this intention is an illusion created by the synchronistic nature of the events. Synchronicities can make you even believe that your family members, your friends, your co-workers, people in the streets, and even corporations acting against you/harassing you on purpose. 

If you find the above indicators in your experience, then what you are observing is synchronicities. This is why people reject your claim. And it’s not that they are aware of your thoughts/actions and they have a reason to reject you. It’s that your thoughts and actions are getting synchronized with the thoughts and actions of people around you. 

Share this knowledge with others so one day we will be able to eradicate this so-called illness from our society by recognizing its existence.

How to find an answer to the mystery behind synchronicity?

To find an answer to this complicated mystery, you will have to research the phenomenon of spirits and experiences of so-called mediums. Mediums were claiming that so-called spirits or souls of the dead use lyrics of songs to communicate with them. According to Theresa Caputo, one of the famous long island mediums states:

““I think some of the most fun and significant coincidences happen through music. It’s like when you’re feeling down or confused, and then you hear a relevant song on the radio, and it’s not even a Top 40 hit. The tune may be your loved one’s favorite song, one you danced to at your wedding, or its lyrics may make your heavy heart feel lighter than it did all day. You happened to turn the radio on, to that station, at that exact moment—and yes, Spirit’s behind it all.”

Source: Caputo, Theresa. There’s More to Life Than This: Healing Messages, Remarkable Stories, and Insight About the Other Side from the Long Island Medium

““When it came on out of the blue at Bertucci’s, which is not a quiet restaurant, it blasted out of the speakers and over the roar of the crowd. My whole family was like, Did the music just come on? Why is this song so loud? And what are the odds that Gram’s song would play in Bertucci’s? I don’t think it’s a typical Italian tune like“Volare” or “Tu Vuò Fà L’Americano.”

Source: Caputo, Theresa. There’s More to Life Than This: Healing Messages, Remarkable Stories, and Insight About the Other Side from the Long Island Medium

People who are being labeled as schizophrenic are reporting the same experience. According to Dan Kilcup:


He observes synchronicities with the songs(lyrics), advertisements, and program presenters.  These synchronicities provide false evidence for the false belief. The following synchronicity has occurred to Kilcup after he recalling an old memory. Since it has occurred to him just after he wakes up, so he sees a significance to it as well. 

On another occasion he states:

These experiences are happening to him as if the radio actually knows his thoughts/actions. Because of this he further states:


This is not a mental illness. What we see here is an intelligence synchronizing events. Which is why some people believe spirits are behind these experiences. This particular experience of people with schizophrenia and people who believe that they are communicating with spirits is the same. However, their conclusion as to what causes it is different. And the reason behind this difference is the type of synchronicities that they face and their unique life experiences.

The cause behind these synchronicities can be understood by analyzing data associated with the phenomenon of spirits, paranormal experiences, and the phenomenon of UFOs as well since all these experiences show a clear correlation.